Events

Events

Talking Point

Analysis

Photo

Video

Islam

Links

Important

Chat

Archive

.

Language

English

Türkçe

Русский

Mirrors 

argun.org

dagestan.org

Mail

Hotmail

Yahoo

Dotexpres

UsaNet


Monday, 31, December 2001

Democracy against the freedom

Democracy against the freedom - idiotic situation, which became traditional.

Our democracy, alas, did not take place. It came back, gave oak, and passed away - according to master Bezenchuk's classification - or, simply stated, it was covered with copper basin. Yeltsin, with this enthusiasm was elected in 1991, did not maintain the role of leader, prophet, our Mosey - and oh, as it would not prevent us to spend 40 years with him in the desert in order to forget about the Soviet boilers with «social guarantees». But Yeltsin, alas, curdled after only 9 years and instead of Mosey proved to be Hindenburg as was predicted to him repeatedly in last years of his presidency. «Tedious is life in this world, gentlemen!»

As much, we overlooked! It is not late whether to be executed now? Or only now - that, beaten and smartened, we will be able to lay road to ourselves by breast in the reign of freedom? Perhaps, above the basic errors precisely now, when there is time and there is no, since the dark forces maliciously oppress us, possibility whatever actively to act (for whom generally there is nothing, besides prison walls around yes the lattice), needs to think over it.


No one among us had to construct democracy, using the fallen freedom from the sky. Main - that misfortune, it goes without saying, that the freedom precisely fell from the sky, but was not achieved, paid by the blood, was obtained in combat and marches: But even by that free freedom, which to us as hare of the sheepskin coat, endowed from the lordly arm of the candidate for memberships in the Politburo of CC of the CP of USSR, Yeltsin, it was nevertheless to use («to profit», as speaks Novodvorskaya) much clever.

So this is to no one. Did not have we its forefront detachment. But there were only sickly and amorphous motions of the type «Demrosia», which they solidly knew, against whom they (in essence against the government of Gorbachev -Ryjkov in 1990), but in no way could formulate their common «in favour of». Yes even they did attempt to formulate? - Judging by that, how many of them as long ago as 1993 proved to be in BD together with Rutsky and Khasbulatov:

We gave vote to all. Even lustration naïvely - good Yeltsin did not care to organize. During September 1991, all in the horror shouted about search of the witches - only, may God save us, and not allow it! - and therefore communists (together with already then by the conceived Nazis) remained frightened, but not destroyed, as would follow. They bred in the next years so that year 1993 became simply inevitable. And now, although we solidly defend the democratic constitutional system of year 1993, to make this is sufficiently complex: indeed simultaneously with the referendum, by which was passed this first democratic constitution in the history of Russia, passed the parliamentary elections, in which won the fascist
Zhirinovsky. And what - to recognize now choice of people partially to 1/2, but people sympathies at the same moment with Zhirinovsky (or in 2 years to Zyuganov) - not to recognize? We, strictly, do not recognize them, and people even can be not right! - but it would nevertheless like larger unity, so to speak, form and content in the democratic country. Otherwise, this always ends with the fact, at what we arrived today.

Result, as said, is before the eyes. That regular result, which takes place always, if we do not complete the revolutions initiated or to lightly charge this to one - only person, even «warrantor».

No criticism maintains «Human Rights» approach of our present Democrats, even quite best of those remaining the same, of those refusing from the very beginning to dance under the Putin’s pipe. They are ready to recognize identical rights after all and to shield all. Friends, true, with the large enthusiasm, than enemies - but even enemies also. Those Komsomol members themselves, who and by them, to their defenders as to one their one-party men in Kaluga, will plant bomb under the door of apartment and will explode. Those Barkashov themselves will shoot them. Such «fighters» anywhere do not befit. They will act not of the interests of the matter, but obeying to the voice of its conscience, which, of course, in general is good, but in them for some reason acquires usually form of «earrings for all sisters». That the interests of the protection of each separate Barkashov or communist in each special case come in the insoluble and tragic contradiction with the common plan of alteration and perestroika of society as a whole - they do not persistently want to note. Selecting part instead of whole, Human Right Activists will obtain as a result neither whole nor even part.

Instead of them fight with the tyranny must the iron army of freedom. It must grow, be forged, be formed under the fire. Such possibilities in proportion to the development of situation will be more and it is more, already in what - in that, but in the repressions of deficiency, it will not foresee. The army, which instead of the eternal indeterminate whimpering and the sighs will set finally before itself as a goal - and it will move to it. Without stopping - at least, it is moral - not before any obstacle.

Yes, strictly, all our differences and spore, all present disagreements between, conditionally speaking, Human Right Activists and revolutionary, lie exclusively at the moral sphere. To do actually, we thus far nevertheless nothing can (although «Human Right Activists» nevertheless have more such possibilities than us). But here its moral relation to the problem, being prepared for the future battles, is obligated to explain already today. Or Human Right Activist lisping with the red-brown, their eternal moderation and accuracy, and the fear of someone, who seems to them enormous military potential of those sympathizing to frighten away by sharp slogan or phrase. Or democracy for the Democrats, but if enemy does not surrender - they destroy it. This indeed is so simple - for the normal person - to become Democrat and to use all goods of
democracy. And our calculation - not according to horde of people and riff-raff, which are principally incapable of this, but which so feel sorry and about «social security» of which so worry our «Human Right Activists» - moralists and humanists. It will be sufficient. They already tried one time. The horde of people loved Zyuganov, but, after all, nevertheless was inclined to the side of Putin - as, «real Colonel!» Following time is necessary simply to be more cleverly and to the elections even is close such not to allow - not hero of this novel, not - desirably - their electorate. But that again after ten years will not bring more sadly in the world.

Democracy against the freedom is idiotic situation, which became traditional. As soon as you will remove from the slaves of boot-tree and give rights to them - they in the free elections voluntarily and with enthusiasm elect for themselves rulers of their yesterday's overseers. And - that the most terrible - to us together with itself!
Such is already the destiny of this nation and this country, and it will be impossible to cure it, apparently. Democracy must not be converted into ochlocracy, but the mask of democracy cannot cover ochlocracy - such is the main lesson of the Yeltsin’s period of the history of Russia. Everything that occurred in the country from the very moment of the explosions of apartments in Moscow during September 1999 - this was precisely ochlocracy, the authority of crowd, the authority of the mass hysteria of the lost senses of the herd. And precisely this hysteria raised Putin to the throne. Our Army of Freedom - the name, of course, purely conditional - only just is added. But the beaten armies, as is known, it is started better than not beaten. It was worthwhile only for Yeltsin’s 91 to introduce lustration, was worthwhile only to drive away KGB, to recognize immediately independence of Chechnya: Ah, how many possibilities were missed!.. We must care and bring up our soldiers so that they would not be frightened as their fathers in year 1991, «search for witches» and they did not repeat these errors next time.

Present self-sufficient imperial statehood of Russia is incompatible with democracy. It means, it will collapse or it will be by one method or another destroyed. Heroic Chechen partisans make today only first steps toward this target, whereas revolutionary party must continue already in Moscow itself. The country, where the authority by centuries exists for itself, considering all the population only given and serfs, without depending on them and despising them, it is genetically incapable of democracy. It means, Russia - this rotten boot tree, which lies across the road of humanity - there must not be and already through years 15-20 will not be present on the political map. The daily nightmare of civilized world at last will end. Democracy will be, and Russia will not be here.

Boris Stomakhin, citizen of Russia, Revolutionary Contact Union.
Specially for «Kavkaz-Center»

Back to top ^^



Also in this section: 

  Interrupted Flight of «Night
   Angels»

  Shamil Basayev held
   consultation

  Democracy against the
   freedom

  Behind scenes of «live
   interaction»
  From washroom to
   cemetery...

  Occupation from within

  Belief is for what they die.
   Ideology is for what they kill
  Missed victories…

  Unpleasant surprises for
   Washington


Events ] Talking Point ] Analysis ] Photo ] Video ] Islam ] Links ] Important ] Chat Archive


Copyright © 1999-2001.  "Kavkaz-Center"  News Agency
The reprint without prior permission is violation of international legislation of the Webmaster:
webmaster@kavkaz.org
The publication of authors may not coincide with ideas of edition of the site "Kavkaz-Center"