|
Kavkaz-Center
continues to acquaint readers with materials of the information site, Daimohk (http://www.daimohk.info/).
We propose to your attention the reflection of the author on the metastases of
the chauvinism, which struck Russian society. The author turns to his own
experience and documentary evidence of representatives of the so-called Russian
intelligentsia.
Who
are Russians? People, who attempts to drown its insolvency in the bitter vodka
or the nation, which carries prosperity? Ask this question from a simple person
and you will hear to the nausea familiar response about mysteriousness of
Russian soul. Ask, what Russia is today and to you will compulsorily be
described about its heroic past (lost in the fields of battles in Chechnya) and
rich natural potential (mercilessly plundered by oligarchs). To you will be told
about national dignity, about global superiority, while the country, as if the
toothless mumbling old woman, which since year beggarly walks in the entire
world with extended hand, but this persistently is not tried to note. Because so
it is convenient, so it is quiet, first of all, for Russians themselves,
speaking in the words of Pushkin: «I myself deceived to be happy».
Great
propagandistic machine skillfully created image of young girl, who looks into
magic mirror and who sees not her deformed nature, but excellent reflection.
Exaltation itself to the people of god and erection of Russian nature to the
form not only of self-deception, but also the rough attachment of the image of
great Slav to others, both on the state and daily level. Is it possible similar
relation to itself and haughtiness to other peoples, due to which exists this
state itself, to explain by nationalism? No, since he assumes not only love for
its nation, but also respect for others. This we, exactly, do not observe.
It means, response to a question lies in genetically transferred and encouraged
chauvinism of Russians, otherwise how to name the policy of the pursuit of
Chechen people, yes even however, the representatives of other nationalities –
how not by chauvinism.
The
daily flow to Russian of the information from television screens and newspaper
pages about that which already became mythical «Chechen trace», tie the
stereotype of cruel, perfidious enemy, worthy only of one fate - destruction.
Idea of Chechen - enmity arose not today and not yesterday, it was cherished by
«elder brother» at a period of centuries and so skillfully was suggested, that
now and then we themselves began to believe in its rightness. Moreover, a
similar view was developed not only by adult, but also by children. Here
remarkably recall my first teacher, Ludmila Georgiyevna Sundukovu - typical
representative of Russian chauvinism, making understand Bolshevik truths by
pointer on the hands and subjected us, six year old children, to the inventive
method of instruction - humiliation.
The
daily repetitive words, until now, return by metallic ringing in the ears: Do
not laugh to tell parents; otherwise my father will shoot them and you. And
nothing will affect me for this, because all of your people – traitors»...But
we would forgive her this and much other (childhood inclined to forget offences),
if her husband and son in 1994 did not return on top of BTR.
My story, as if of mirror reflection, was repeated 20 years later with other
characters and elsewhere. Very recently I came across one of the last year's
edition of the newspaper «Novoya Gazeta», in which my attention was drawn by
publication of Victoria Chutkova, «Hands of Mciri in hexogen».
Summary:
Teacher of literature sows international dissension based on the examples of
world classics. Model of the literary hero «Mciri» is compared with real
historically prevailing form of national character, What’s more Mciri - This
is insidious Muslim Chechen, and Slav is respectable Christian, patriot. I
precisely cite teacher Ludmila Zhanovny's words: «I told children that Mciri
two-faced and perfidious, and furthermore Chechen! It means, this was in the
blood of his people. Ten years, he lived in the monastery. Could he leave it?
Yes, he could. But he did not leave, but the powerful spirit of his fathers
cherished all this time. And he ran, when they in altar prayed for him...»
«What a powerful spirit, what a gigantic nature of this Mciri», wrote
Belinskiy.
But
let great critic rolls into Tatars, with his hopeless obsolete treatments. All
this into smithereens is marked off against one reason of schoolteacher, who is
found on the service in the state idea, and who zealously defends it. Yes,
gentlemen of classics! New time dictates new formulas. All your brilliant
thoughts are given by the Russian modernism to the scrap.
So far Duma entreats all parties to create ideology in Russia everywhere it
spreads state idea – «chauvinism». It is probable, there is hope that this
idea will be formed into ideology, until on its guard stands Ludmila Zhanovna -
product of the pure fascism, camouflaged in the Bolshevik clothing, which bring
up in their students the spirit of non-acceptance to all but Russian.
But,
let me ask you a question, respected Ludmila Zhanovna: from what such Slavs of
the blue blood with the overseas patronymic you yourselves come from? Already,
not of those of you Ivanov, who do not remember their origin? Continue to
educate your children in the spirit of non-acceptance to our people, and
tomorrow for you is prepared one fraction - to walk with the mug in the hands
and drop coins in it. The lessons of hatred will turn against you. And generally,
what today can give your powerlessness in its old age, plains of Russia in
comparison to eternally young, seething and strong mountains?
Tell me that among these walls
Could you give me instead of
That brief friendship, but living
Between stormy heart and thunderstorm
The lessons of Russian chauvinism are not finished, these have their
continuation and moreover, they will gather force, since the great totalitarian
machine revives.
From
the eclectic article of V.Chutkova, which appeared in the pro-Jew newspaper «Novaya
Gazeta», I perceived not so much tendency to protect us, Chechens, but, most
likely the attempt to lead the attack of heavy type, carried above their own
heads. The hydra of Russism turned now its angry view to their side. Results are
awaited...
|
