|
Extensive
quotation have appeared in Internet from the book of Russian General - criminal
Troshev " My war: Notes of entrenched General ". Well it is clear,
that it was not a wedding. Having guessed, that for publishing of the book
prepares that what was offered by gallows for Chechens and spoke about refined
"dishes" with which are treated unfortunate refugees in the Ingush
small tent towns.
We
shall tell directly that even fragments of the book testify that the book is
written for rather naive readers; with the claim on Jukov for cadets of military
school, so to say. And entrenched General Troshev convinces no more, than staff
of Shtemenko or well-known Paskevich - Erivancski. The truth about the word
"entrenchment" is not up to the point; you see Russian soldiers are
beaten off in entrenchments in the
Chechen
Republic
not by Germans, but offensively attack, bomb, causing death and methodically
exterminate whole people. Is it possible to believe, that "cleaning"
is carried out by the one lying in an entrenchment, but by the one applying
tactics of the burnt ground. But, it is a profession of Gennady Troshev - war,
that is entrenchments, trenches, dugouts, a camouflage etc. He has nothing to do
with morals; he has never to reflect on fair or unfair character of war. He
carries out the order, and at leisure in an entrenchment writes the book about
the Second to " Great Patriotic war " Come on and deny this
military phrase.
Only
slightly covered hostility of the author to journalist brotherhood does not
surprise any more - tradition almost classical. "Commander" accuses
military administration of Russian Federation of cap throwing at the first war
in Chechen Republic, which resulted in catastrophe. The author tries to theorize
new Caucasian war as a whole and to analyse more concrete things, for example -
" specificity of prospecting and tactical operations in mountain conditions
". Only one other thing is not clear, namely weak arithmetica. The General
continually repeats a phrase " insignificant losses of federal armies
". And opponent, according toTroshev, always has significant losses. And if
to combine together all these losses of the opponent, it turns out, that
Chechens in the world are not less than five millions. Otherwise they should not
remain at all on the ground. But hardly such antediluvian arithmetica confuses
the General.
The
tendency to name Russian army as "federal" is also boring one. Clearly,
neither Buryat, nor Tatar armies are at war.
There is
a fairy tale in the book that right at the beginning of the first war when
Russian armies came into Chechen Republic, insurgents used the peaceful
population as a live shield, violently having driven women and children on
walking road. Russian give out practically always similar lie, when try to
justify their own defeat or massacre of peaceful inhabitants.
Reading
the entrenched fiction of Troshev, there is clear logic of the deputy chief of
the Joint Staff of armed Forces of Russia, Jury Baluevski, who denies messages
on losses of occupational soldiers in Chechen Republic, published in the site
"Caucasus - Centre ". Again there are " insignificant losses
", since December 1994. It is amusing, that a number of MASS-MEDIA put
under doubt competence of Baluevski and criticize him rather originally; as he
comes with such "source of information "?
It
is readable on one of "serious" sites SMI.RU of Gleb Pavlovsk: "
Anyway, that fact causes regret, that Russian MASS-MEDIA and respectable news
agencies again have begun to quote frank disinformation from the odious site of
"Kavkaz.org" edited by " Chechen Gebbels Movladi Udugov”. It is
interesting; that Russian General teaches certain anonymous internet lists which
before revelation indecently convicts Baluevski of incompetence. Ministry of
Defence of Russia did not respond to actual insult of SMI.RU.
We
may find partly answer in Julia Kalinina’s article " Conquest by Caucasus
", printed in " Moscow Komsomolets ", where the author frightens
Muscovites, that soon the capital will turn to Sukhumi or Krasnodar, in other
words, Caucasians have almost subdued Belokamennaya. Radical Muscovites - not
from Bobruisk, you see, it is a pity for Moscow, which " profaned brisk
guards of visitors from Caucasus " for, in her opinion, " that is
natural and organic in Minvodah and Gelenjika, in Moscow looks offensive and
opposite to nature ". So that, the third Rome is not for barbarians.
Give
it to French and Swedes, but not to Azerbaijanians and Armenians. The female
journalist has forgotton, that racism is opposite to nature and she
unambiguously adheres to it. Kalinina writes, that Caucasians including
Chechens, their hostility to Russian is caused by rather short
coexistence and that they yet have not forgotten the Caucasian wars and
deportations: " they deeply despise us and fiercely hate ". She is
perplexed: " What for to us to live together with those, who hate us and we
are afraid of them? " Also comes, at last, to rather logical conclusion:
" What for to us that we did not begin to want, that the Chechen Republic
should remain in structure of Russia? "
She
almost has reached to the truth, which is inaccessible for the entrenched
General; to conquer some one's ground is not achievement and goodness, on the
contrary, it give rise to only enemies and foes. Caucasians have not occupied
Moscow, but Russian, including Muscovites, occupied Caucasus. And if all are
equal in rights and together, be kind to suffer. You see, tolerance will not be
taken away from you.
But
if " tropical duplication of clever and artful Caucasians is in danger,
then " let Muscovites expostulate on generals, but not on sellers of greens
and fruit at the underground stations of metro. What is concerned with the book of
Troshev, then reading about "company commander" feats against the
peaceful population, the impression is created, as if the issue is war at least
with the American regular army. Or as if you read the book of 19-th century
" Conquest of Caucasus by the Russian weapon " and it is vain to
search in it for a rational grain. It simply is not present, as war for the
entrenched General is bread, water and air. Not without reason is such
name:
" My war ". And such is Russian militarism.
|
