Events

Events

Press

Analysis

Photo

Video

Islam

Links

Important

Archive

.

Language

English

Türkçe

Ðóññêèé

Mirrors 

argun.org

dagestan.org

Mail

Hotmail

Yahoo

Dotexpres

UsaNet


Tuesday, 16, April 2001
Does a crisis of power exist in Georgia?

The strained relations between members of government indicate that an “acute crisis of power” is being observed in Georgia and that the president of the country should take appropriate measures to overcome it, states the leader of a parliamentary group “New Fraction”, David Gamgrelidze.  Gamgrelidze told in an interview to a Georgian agency “Prime News” that if the Justice Minister Michael Saakashvili expresses distrust towards the Office of Public Prosecutor, it means that either the Prosecutor’s Office should be dissolved or the head of the Ministry of Justice should be dismissed.  He says it is time to put an end to the extensively hushed up but still aggravating contradictions between leading “Union of Georgian Citizens”, State Office and Parliament of the country. Otherwise these will bring a misfortune to Georgia, claims Gamgrelidze.  In his opinion, an introduction of prime-minister institution and a formation of Georgian government under the principle of a single team may serve as a solution to the present situation.  A few days ago the Justice Minister Michael Saakashvili accused the Minister of Economy, Industry and Trade Ivane Chkhartishvil of having certain “personal interests” in the joint-stock company “Chiaturmagnesium” and Zestafoni ferroalloy plant.  In response, Chkhartishvili demanded a thorough investigation of the accusations by the Office of Public Prosecutor.  Saakashvili replied, in turn, that he does not trust the Office of Public Prosecutor, which, he claims, has not arrested a single person involved in corruption yet. 

The so-called “Chechen issue” also considerably influences the situation in Georgia.  The Chairman of the Parliamentary Committee of Defense and National Security in Georgia, George Baramidze, adheres to this opinion.  According to the parliamentarian’s information, some people “propagating separatist ideas as well as Wahabbis are present” in the Pankisi Gorge, place of residence of Chechen people. He believes that there are no guaranties of maintaining stability and, yet, no apparent danger of conflict onset in the region. Despite the problems at hand, in the opinion of Baramidze, as a whole, the Georgian authorities keep the situation under their control.  The parliamentarian states that Tbilisi does not support the “Chechen separatists” since Tbilisi “does not benefit neither in emotional nor in pragmatic way”.  In his opinion, by charging Tbilisi for supporting Chechen Mujahideen, “the Russian government attempts either to blame Georgia for its failures in Chechnya or to involve the country in the war”.  George Baramidze noted that at the end of March in the UN Security Council the Russian representatives put a veto on the document, worked out by the international organization, concerning the status of Abkhazia as a part of Georgia. “Russia, verbally recognizing the territorial integrity of Georgia, practically is demonstrating the contrary”, he remarked in an interview to the Russian “Nezavisimaya Gazeta” (“Independent Newspaper”).  He believes that this can also be testified by the introduction of a privileged visa policy for the unrecognized republics of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.  The parliamentarian suggests that “the politics of Russia, based on imperialistic thinking, lead to the creation of an “instability belt” around itself”.  George Baramidze also remarked that “from the military viewpoint it is absolutely senseless for Russia to have military bases in Georgia; they play only a political role, while representing seats of possible destabilization on the territory of Georgia”.

Representatives of the Chechen government, in their turn, strongly disagree with the statements that “separatist sprouts” are ripening in the Pankisi Gorge. Our correspondent was old at the Chechen representative office in Tbilisi that such statements are not new.  They only reflect the variable degree of political partiality of a given Georgian politician.  Both Moscow and certain forces in Georgia wish to use the “Chechen card” for destabilization in the country.  The official representatives of the Chechen Republic Ichkeria, however,consider these plans as very unlikely to come true.

Anzor Tsinamdzgrshvili, ÊAVKAZ-CENTER

Back to top ^^



Also in this section: 

  Chechen subterfuge of
   Putin

  Does a crisis of power exist
   in Georgia?

  Moscow loses agents

  Russian bases will be used
   on discretion of Tbilisi
  The West wants to remove
   Kuchma
  Toilet for NTV
  «Chechen Mothers» called
   UN for actions
  The Georgian opposition
   criticizes Shevardnadze

  Gun meat may also come
   to an end one day

  War in Near East is
   inevitable?
  Timoshenko is ready to
   become the President

  Russia in the loop


Events ] Press ] Analysis ] Photo ] Video ] Islam ] Links ] Important ] Archive


Copyright © 1999-2001.  "Kavkaz-Center"  News Agency
The reprint without prior permission is violation of international legislation of the Webmaster:
webmaster@kavkaz.org
The publication of authors may not coincide with ideas of edition of the site "Kavkaz-Center"